Share for friends:

Desolation Angels (1995)

Desolation Angels (1995)

Book Info

Author
Genre
Series
Rating
3.92 of 5 Votes: 4
Your rating
ISBN
1573225053 (ISBN13: 9781573225052)
Language
English
Publisher
riverhead books

About book Desolation Angels (1995)

В «громадной и безумной легенде» Керуака «Ангелы опустошения» следуют за «Бродягами Дхармы». И если «Бродяги» заканчиваются признанием в любви богу и жаждой обретения нового опыта, то «Ангелы» этот самый опыт воспроизводят, а затем и то, что за ним следует. Роман составлен из двух книг. Изначально это и были две разные книги, но их объединение закономерно, потому как вторая, «Проездом», становится возможной и, собственно, «проездной» благодаря тому знанию, которое герой получает после своего добровольного затворничества на пике Опустошения. Пребывание на пике лишено тех оптимистично-обнадёживающих интонаций, которыми полнятся «Бродяги Дхармы», пик из столь желанного убежища превращается в наихудшее из всех мест в мире. В этой части, полной поэзий и прозрений, хватает и тоски, и понимания того, что есть стихи, которые «надо написать, о сердцах, а не просто о скалах». Герою нужны люди, и тусовки, и пьянки, и смятые кушетки, в общем, всё то, за что так полюбился Керуак, простигосспади, массовому читателю (да, тем самым чувакам, от которых он до конца жизни будет в ужасе бегать — вечная беда недопонятого или поверхностно понятого художника). Но при наличии всего этого антуража сам он никогда уже не будет прежним: книга жёстко фиксирует момент перехода, или «полного оборота», по выражению самого Керуака, «от молодёжного храброго чувства приключения к полной тошнотности, касающейся опыта мира вообще, отвращения по всем шести чувствам».Тем не менее, герой в этот мир спускается, и вторая книга описывает движняк в Мексике, Штатах, Танжере, Париже, Лондоне, снова Штатах, захватывая неимоверное количество персонажей и историй, в этом смысле она сильно динамичнее первой, хотя и здесь Керуак, разумеется, перебивает истории «непростительным трёпом» о тщете существования, бесконечном страдании и о том, что все мы падшие ангелы.Проза Керуака — это проза неимоверной силы и уязвимости. И то и другое обусловлено искренностью и пресловутым автобиографизмом, хотя в первую очередь, конечно, искренностью. Это обнажённая душа, с которой каждый вправе делать, что хочет: громоздить Керуака на пьедестал и называть королём бита или обвинять в «печатании» и зубоскалить на тему «Джек и мамочка». Но мы же Керуака любим и потому таким страдать не будем, «правильно? правильно, читатели?» А будем мы сострадать, и смотреть, что он нам показывает, и ржать, где смешно, и печалиться, где грустно, потому как текст нам эти возможности даёт — он по-прежнему живой, пульсирующий, и Керуака в нём слышно, он становится собеседником, он хочет говорить. Так давайте разговаривать. Через годы, страны, смерти и прочую преходящую херню. «Ибо если душа не может вырваться из тела, отдайте мир Мао-Цзэ-дуну».

This is really two books – the first book, Desolation Angels, was actually rather tedious, and I was at first regretting I had even started to read this at all. It also didn't help that I’d read about his stint as a fire lookout on Desolation Peak twice before (Lonesome Traveler, Dharma Bums) so I'd more than had my fill already – I was starting to feel (Buddhism, schmuddism) I couldn’t care less. It was Gary Snyder that inspired him to go there (mountains and sutras both, I guess) in the first place, and Kerouac, being his good ol' honest self, here eventually gets disenchanted with that entire Buddhist disenchantment. Not that this is an uninteresting development - it just takes him too many rambling pages to get there. The second book, Passing Through, he had originally intended to publish as a separate book, and if so I'd probably have given it a four star rating. Here Kerouac brings his disenchantment with him to Mexico, back to New York; to Tangiers, Paris and London, again back to New York and from there all through America to San Francisco - and back again.. - In Tangiers: "...there's poor Irwin at midnight calling up to me from the garden 'Come on down Jack-Kee, there’s a big bunch of hipsters and chicks from Paris in Bull's room.' And just like in New York or Frisco or anywhere there they are all hunching around in marijuana smoke, talking, the cool girls with long thin legs in slacks, the men with goatees, all an enormous drag after all and at the time (1957) not even started yet officially with the name of 'Beat Generation.' .... Nothing can be more dreary than 'coolness' (not Irwin's cool, or Bull's or Simon's, which is natural quietness) but postured, actually secretly rigid coolness that covers up the fact that the character is unable to convey anything of force or interest, a kind of sociological coolness soon to become a fad up into the mass of middle-class youth for awhile. There’s even a kind of insultingness, probably unintentional, like when I said to the Paris girl just fresh she said from visiting a Persian Shah for Tiger hunt 'Did you actually shoot the tiger yourself?' she gave me a cold look as tho I’d just tried to kiss her at the window of a Drama School." - (Irwin=Ginsberg, Bull=Burroughs, Simon=Orlovsky) - He gets-the-hell-out-of-there and heads to Paris, which isn't much better, and where Raphael Urso (Gregory Corso) takes him to "meet disagreeable American beatniks in apartments and bars and all that’s 'cool' comes on again, only it's Easter and the fantastic candy stores in Paris have chocolate fishes in their windows three feet long." He ends up spending the entire night translating his girlfriends French to him, and further ends up having to pay the bar bill, with just enough money left to get him to London. "I'm mad as hell at Raphael for making me spend all that money and there he is yelling at me again how greedy and nowhere I am. (...) In the morning I sneak out with the excuse a girl is waiting for me in a cafe, and I never come back. I just walk all over Paris with the bag on my back looking so strange even the whores of St Denis dont look at me. I buy my ticket to London and eventually go." Here’s the Kerouac that I like: "no fiction, no craft, no revising afterthoughts, the heartbreaking discipline of the veritable fire ordeal where you cant go back but have made the vow of "speak now or forever hold your tongue" and all of it innocent go-ahead confession," as he puts it in the first part of Passing Through, and after the dullness (of too much introvert desolation maybe) of the first book, it was a relief to find that the second contained some of the better of his writings.

Do You like book Desolation Angels (1995)?

This book is the best reason I can think of for anyone ever learning to read. I've spent most of it with my mouth - metaphorically - hanging open, and my heart perpetually glowing and breaking along with Kerouac's various and numerous highs and lows. Can you be in love with someone who died years before you were even a twinkle in the eye of the universe? I think so. This is not On the Road, and On the Road is nothing by comparison. That is, if there can be any other piece of writing that could even come close to being comparable with Desolation Angels. Of course, from somewhere and someone there will be, but with the same kind of sincerity and authenticity that Kerouac delivers? I seriously doubt it. The things he sees and thinks and writes, they're gorgeous, uplifting, insane, horrific, and sometimes bleak beyond belief. But through it all there is a shocking sweetness and sometimes earnest naivety from Kerouac himself, which endears so much about the world to - I'm certain - anyone who reads it. I still don't believe in God, but Kerouac has given me the best reasons why belief is still important, and can still be beautiful. Oh, and the temptation to hop on a train and disappear into the unknown, is a force to contend with once finished... You know when you've just finished reading something utterly wonderful, and you feel all pretentiously gob-smacked that your brain has been irrevocably changed? My poor brain! There's no going back.
—Laura

This book makes a great sequel to the dharma bums, even though it was actually written first. It starts with Kerouac's incredible isolation at the top of the Mountain and slowly sees him re-emerging into his crazy life, but never being able to get over the feeling of isolation and depression that he felt on the mountain top. My favorite part of this was when he was slowly returning to the world. I think this was partly because I was familiar with the places he was visiting. It was amusing to hear Everett described as Hell! (which it is). And then my favourite line of the whole book describing bars in Seattle, "My God they ben drinkin! Every one is a lush, I can see it - Seattle!" Then he went to a burlesque show in Seattle. 50 years earlier it's good to see that so little has changed. I could imagine him wandering into foxes if he'd been there in the 90s instead of the 50s. After so much isolation, the madness of San Francisco seemed rather off putting. Kerouac didn't seem to have the same love for the fun and the same drive that he did earlier. It was interesting to have read Carolyn Cassady's biography first and put this in context with them. I think part of the problem I had was that I didn't like one of his friends very much, he just seemed to spend his entire time fantasising about being rich. The 2nd half of the novel looses the Buddhist overtones of the first half. (It was written about 5 years later). It talks about trips discussed elsewhere (for instance in Lonesome Traveller), and his relationship with Joyce. I think the ending is one of the saddest things I've read. His roadtrip across the country with his mother to begin a new life in California which both of them end up hating. It was very personal and very sad. Even the publication of his novel didn't seem to change the utter defeat that is in these last few chapters. Definitely recommended, a lovely sad tale.
—Mel

ON THE ROAD...with Mom This book may come as a real shock to those whom have a preconcieved notion about what the "Beats" were all about, and it may also be a shock for those more familiar with the jubilant ecstatic life affirmations of On The Road or even The Dharma Bums. In this book Jack goes on the road (with Mom), has sex with a fourteen year old mexican prostitute, meets up with a Neal (Cody) whom is a far fly from his On the Road days and is tied down with a wife + three kids and a job, meets Salidore Dali + William Carlos WIlliams + Carl Sandburg, gets his book published, is constantly compulsively depressed, has a paradigmatic consciousness flip after a huge dose of opium, meets up with junkie Burroughs in Tangiers (whom is lovelorn over Ginsburg), and kicks Buddhism down a notch for a more hardcore return to Christianity. As others have noted, this book follows directly after the Dharma Bums and that book should be read first. What follows is Jack's experiences on the mountain which, contrary to his expectations in Dharma Bums, is almost like a nightmare prison sentence. After he leaves the mountain, we enter into the first half of the book (his return to California), which is a bit ponderous and slow (but never boring). We are treated to a tortureous description of his day of betting at a race track with Neal and Corso. The book picks up speed bigtime when he goes back on the road and then travels internationally. His prose is brilliant and poetic and his observations remarkable and I think this book is brilliant; but it is also tremendously sad, deeply frusterated and lost, spiritually drained and destitute, and there is little ecstacy to be had. By the end of the book, and with the return of his compulsive obsession with Christianity, one can really sense the beginning of his psychosis and alcoholism and mommy obsession which would spell his death by age fourty seven. I'm not sure to whom this book should be recommended- for I'm not sure whom would care about this descent of an icon for joy. It should definetly be read by those whom have read On the Road and the Dharma Bums, but also by those whom think that the counter cultural movements were all done by joy seeking thrill addicts without a care in the world. After reading this book, it would seem that caring is something that was not is short supply amongst these bands of fellow travelers on the way. Also, those whom felt that the beats were all leftist radicals, anarchists and communists would be very suprised to read in this book that Jack almost seems like a rightist in many regards. He reads a book on the atrocities of communism on the mountain, he constantly is remarking about totalitarian regimes (in particular- Russia), brings up Mao (at a time when some on the left felt he may have been a hero and the crimes against "reactionaries" hadn't yet come into light) and Castro (while others went off to visit Cuba jack said "I'm not concerned with the Cuban Revolution, I'm concerned with the American Revolution.") and even Zapata is discussed in negative diatribes. He was also a fan of Ike. He spends far more time bitching about leftist than he does about rightists. He also has some special scorn put aside for the common hipster, the mass of "beats" whom came after. Very moving, sad, beautiful, profound, funny, poetic- a treasure from a real man at the start of his turn into a caricature by the mass media. By the end, when he drags his mother to california and he doesn't have hardly a nickel, he truely does seem like a little boy lost, crushed still by the death of his brother Gerard and his father whom he found, crushed by all the love lost, by all the dreams evaporated. Evey place he goes, he believes that happiness may lie at the next stop- but once he gets there, there is only sadness once again. At first he wants to return to the mountain on which he'd felt so trapped, but by the end of the book, he just wants to return to the womb.
—Alan Scott

download or read online

Read Online

Write Review

(Review will shown on site after approval)

Other books by author Jack Kerouac

Other books in series duluoz legend

Other books in category Fiction