Share for friends:

The Unicorn (1987)

The Unicorn (1987)

Book Info

Author
Genre
Rating
3.64 of 5 Votes: 1
Your rating
ISBN
014002476X (ISBN13: 9780140024760)
Language
English
Publisher
penguin books

About book The Unicorn (1987)

Доста ме обърква Мърдок и макар че нямам почти никакъв опит с нейните романи, в известна степен се повториха усещанията ми от "Италианското момиче". Смесването на мистицизъм, философия, самоанализ, наблюдение, истина и измислица е опасна плоскост, в която - мисля си - мярката е онова, което липсва на "Еднорогът".Интересно е рамкирането на действието. Сюжетът започва с пристигането в ново, непознато, любопитно пространство и приключва с напускането му. Историята обаче, започва много по-рано и действително не приключва.Текстът е особен, защото си играе с оксиморонните понятия "познато" - "непознато", както и с "реално" - "измислено". Спорно е дали Мериън Тейлър е основният персонаж, въпреки че привидно романът следва именно нейния път. При втори поглед обаче, ставя ясно, че образът й, подобно на всички останали, се претопява в необяснимото, заключено измежду страниците на "Еднорогът" и на тежките врати на замъка Гейз.Това, което категорично не харесвам, е пренасищането с герои. До самия финал трудно свързвах имена с постъпки и въпреки че излишни роли няма, характеристиките някак успяват да се размият. Що се отнася до Хана, струва ми се, че ще се нуждая от повторен прочит след време, за да разбера всички идеи, използвани при изграждането на нейния образ. Заиграването с божеството, което има истинска и неистинка същност не ми е твърде по вкуса, а паралелът с митичното същество зависи от посоката, която ще бъде избрана, за да се разтълкува символиката на еднорога. Когато в един роман се смесят усещанията за тайна, вина, любов (която обаче не е любов), семейство, смърт, привързаност, разбиране, въображение, познание и вяра; то се оказва, че четем книга за всичко. Литературата, която аз обичам, е доста по-конкретна и категорична в заключенията, които прави. Мърдок все още не говори на моя език, но ме кара да любопитствам и ако преди една година време бях категорична, че повторна наша среща няма да има; сега не бих се ангажирала с обещания.

I hadn´t borrowed a book for yonks! A friend was reading Iris Murdoch in the school playground while we were waiting for the kids, and when I mentioned I had never read any of her books, she lent me this one. It is an old dog-eared copy: I cannot find the edition in goodreads. It appears she has read it several times: she noted the years on the flyleaf.I remember reading books like this one when I was a teenager. Lots of names come to mind. Marguerite Duras. Milan Kundera. Herman Hesse. Miguel de Unamuno. Kafka. It is the kind of novel written by an intellectual. It is highly cerebral, giving in to the philosophical. Its characters overthink emotions, dissect love, experience sex as something cosmic or teluric. D.H.Lawrence? Thomas Hardy?The oppressive atmosphere is very effectively done. Marian arrives at an isolated house to act as a cultivated lady companion to Hannah, the lady of Gaze Castle. Hannah is kept as a prisoner in this house, watched over by an entourage of eccentric characters who adore her. She has been imprisoned by her husband, Peter, who now lives in America and is a kind of Godot that everybody waits for and never arrives. Hannah has learnt acceptance of this situation. So long she is calm, her gaolers are happy to carry on as they all are. Marian has just arrived and hasn´t fallen under the spell yet: she wants to set Hannah free. She finds it difficult to engage an accomplice: they all seem to foresee that if this difficult balance is upset, they will destroy one another.Sometimes Murdoch makes her literary references a bit too explicit for my liking. If you pick up this novel, you are probably bound to "catch" them easily anyway. Courtly love. The belle dame sans merci. Sleeping Beauty. That sort of thing. As for the meaning of this allegory, the thing that comes to my mind is the fear that cerebral people have of giving in to emotions, of losing control, forgetting themselves. Otherwise it doesn´t end like a Shakespearean comedy, like Marian was hoping, all lovers united; it ends up like Hamlet, a house strewn with corpses.

Do You like book The Unicorn (1987)?

This is a solid psychological drama and, perhaps for that very reason, only a lackluster gothic novel. The gothic trappings are present: nicely ominous scenery, mysterious and threatening characters, an old manor with a buried history. But all of this is set dressing. The substance of the story is people—pretty sane people, on the whole—talking to each other and thinking about things and sometimes falling in love. The atmosphere is somewhat at odds with the subject matter. The threatening characters never rise to the level of actual threats. The secrets of Gaze Castle, when revealed, are not particularly shocking; they lack the edge of perversity you’d expect. It’s all a little too subdued and realistic and not particularly fun. I think the problem is that gothic fiction is an inherently melodramatic genre, while Murdoch is most comfortable with psychological realism. When she strives for a melodramatic effect, as she does toward the end of the novel, where the body count takes a steep and sudden climb, the extreme developments feel a little incongruous with what comes before.I don’t want to give the impression that this is a bad novel. It’s very far from that. It contains many vivid descriptions of scenery and some excellent characterization. But I guess well-done psychological realism is not enough to float my boat, as a reader, unless the characters are ones I can really relate to. And I sorta liked Marian, and there were moments when I warmed to Effingham, but I wasn’t crazy about either. They are fairly regular people with fairly ordinary flaws thrust into a moderately bizarre situation. Gothic novels don’t require caricature, of course, but a few vivid and exaggerated details of characterization might have gone a long way toward making this a more memorable reading experience.There are still a couple Iris Murdoch novels I’d like to try before I give up on her (I know this was an odd place to start). On the basis of The Unicorn she is a skilled author, worth reading for sure, but perhaps not for me.
—Aaron Jansen

Phew, I finally made it to the very last page! But, honestly speaking, I don't know what to make of it, really. At the beginning I really enjoyed reading this book and felt utterly mesmerised by its Gothic setting and mysterious plot, but the further I got the less I understood (or so it felt) and the more annoyed I became with the main characters' erratic and inadequate behavior. The book left too many questions and not a single answer or at least a clue! At one point it felt as if I could never make head or tail of it without a half-liter of [insert any alcoholic drink here]. On a side note; aha, now I get it, that's why everyone's constantly drinking whiskey in this book! But anyway, it was an amazing novel, ambiguous and depressive but quite deep, thought-provoking and just plain WOW. A tough nut to crack that definitely needs re-reading.
—Yulia

This review isn’t going to be long, as I finished this book a few weeks ago and never got around to writing the review. Perhaps because I thought I couldn’t do it justice, because I wasn’t sure I would be able to properly explain why I am rating it 5 stars. I guess, simplest answer, is that it had almost everything I like in a novel; desolate setting, weird characters, tragedy/tragic romance, and it makes you think about it when you’re done. This novel, just from the title evokes symbolism and the idea that it should not be taken at face value. I love novels that do this. And I found it moved at a slow burn pace, which I also enjoy. It had culminating action in the last quarter of the novel and I thought the ending was as it should be. As the story was about “the unicorn” the question is raised about who the unicorn is. I would argue that the story is actually about Marian rather than Hannah – while Hannah is the one who drives the action, it’s Marian who learns from it, who changes throughout the novel. Hannah is already doomed – Marian is the one who has to survive. But that’s the kind of thing this novel does for you – it allows you to take a concept or an idea from the novel and play with it for awhile in your mind. The novel is not just a story about a crazy lady in an old house – it’s about much more than that, but Murdoch leaves it up to us to decide what that is. We can take what we want from it. I also found the mystery intriguing, I liked the characters because it was hard to figure out where their loyalties lay, and I enjoyed the tone. There was something consistently menacing about the novel – even when Marian was doing something simple like walking – it was like a ghost was consistently haunting the place with sorrow. Overall, I simply adored this novel. It was like an old Gothic tale but because it was more modern people talked about and had sex ((view spoiler)[Murdoch also did a great job with the subtleties of Marian’s attraction to Denis – when it culminated I was overjoyed because I was hoping it would happen (hide spoiler)]
—Tina

download or read online

Read Online

Write Review

(Review will shown on site after approval)

Other books by author Iris Murdoch

Other books in category Fiction