Hand in the Glove features Dol Bonner, a young woman who has started her detective agency with the financial help of wealthy heiress Sylvia Raffray, who is on the cusp of taking over her family fortune. Her Guardian, P.L. Storrs, objects to Sylvia's involvement in the detective business as it's created some bad publicity. He pursuades Sylvia to agree to quit the agency and her professional association with Dol which will essentially for Dol into a far less plush and favorable position. However, Dol gets her first solo job when P.L. hires her to rid his family of a cult leader who is draining his wife financially. She heads to P.L.'s home in Connecticut with this goal, but everything changes when she finds P.L. strangled and hung up by a wire. Dol sets out to solve the murder of her friend's ward and prove herself as a detective.Nero Wolfe doesn't appear in this story, but Inspector Cramer does make a cameo. Bonner actually shares one key feature with Nero Wolfe: a contempt for the oppositie sex, though her's is not so severe as to prevent her from having men work for her or from being a caring sister. She also has a verbal feature in common with Wolfe: how she tells subordinates to take notes. When I read her saying to a male detective, "Your notebook..." I got de javu. I wonder if this was intentional or if Stout couldn't think any other way a detective might tell someone to take notes.In other ways, they are mirror images. Wolfe an experienced late middle aged man and Bonner a young pretty woman feeling her way in the art of detection. While Wolfe remains reticent about his past and we only get tiny glimpses throughout the Corpus, Bonner tells straight up her backstory and why she thinks so little of men: she was jilted by one. Bonner's efforts to solve the case are met with sarcasm, annoyance, and amusement. A police officer smirks when he sees Bonner getting her detection kit out of the car and Sylvia tells her to put it away. Even Bonner's not so sure. She puts forth a strong front of absolute confidence, she's riddled with self-doubt. Is she really a detective or is she "just playing." Thus Bonner mission is to prove herself to herself.The story is weakened by a forgetable cast of 1930s stereotypes, the occultic huckster, the heavy-drinking newsman, the dutiful butler, and the aloof bohemian poet daughter. Only the psychologist who is in need of a psychologist provides any spark and not enough of that. Sylvia Raffray fills the part of spoiled rich kid and is completely useless to Dol. While everyone seems to like her, it's a mystery to me why they do.Even with a stronger cast of supporting characters, it's doubtful Bonner would have ever made it in a series. Her disrespect for men was unlike to make her popular with men or women. Plus, her uncertainty in the face of challenge is unlikely to connect with modern women in the age of girl power. Hand in the Glove is a serviceable 1930s mystery. What sets it apart from other 1930s mystery that are gathering dust in libraries across America is that it was written by one of America's most talented mystery writers and featured a character who would go on to appear as a supporting character in the greatest detective series ever.I should also note that a TV adaptation of Hand in the Glove was produced by NBC in 1992 called Lady Against the Odds that featured Crystal Bernard (Wings) as Dol Bonner and is available on Netflix. The TV movie made a number of departures. The time period was changed to World War II (which is far more exciting to most viewers than 1937), rather than having the case confined to the estate as the book does, Dol travel back and forth questioning witnesses. It also changed the character of Dol Bonner and removed the man-hating elements. While there was a bit of melodrama and some things that didn't ring true to the period, after reading the book, I think they probably did the best they could with it.
This is the one and only novel Rex Stout wrote with a female detective as the main character. Dol Bonner shows up as supporting cast in a few Nero Wolfe stories, but in this one, she's the star. It's Dol's first murder, and first big case. I think Stout does a fair job of giving us a newly minted detective, and doesn't harp too much on the fact that she's female. It is a good mystery, not something simple - definitely something which would have challenged Archie or Saul, had they been there. The story kept me guessing and the characters were engaging - which, really, is what I look for in a Stout mystery.My one complaint? That there aren't any more books devoted to Dol Bonner.
Do You like book The Hand In The Glove (1983)?
Man, I keep reading Rex Stout novels that are not Nero Wolfe stories, hoping that they'll be just as great, and I keep getting disappointed. This is better than the others I've read, I suppose, but still no where nearly as satisfying as a Wolfe. I'd been thinking that the problem is that the main character here - Dol Bonner, a female detective who plays a minor recurring role in the Wolfe novels - doesn't really show the qualities or competence that have garnered her Wolfe's & Goodwin's respect. But on reflection, I think my main complaint is that Stout himself is not nearly as engaging a narrator as Archie Goodwin, and that might be the problem with all his other books.
—John
I stumbled upon this book at a used bookstore, and since Dol Bonner had appeared on several occasions, I thought I'd read it.First of all, the formula Stout had developed with Wolfe, really doesn't work well in this case. The middle seems to drag and the denouement seems too quick.Given that this is Dol Bonner's first murder case (and a very early case for her detective agency), I can understand all the "buck up, Dol, you can do it" internal dialogue that this book is riddled with, but it became repetitive after a while. It is nowhere near as witty as Archie's banter to the audience (and himself.) Also the constant mentioning that Dol disliked men and why should have only been mentioned once or twice, and not the half-dozen or more times it was brought up.The mystery itself was good, including Dol's detective work and her handling of the clues, but I can't rate this story as highly as Stout's Wolfe books (still, it was better than "Under the Andes"...)
—A.G. Lindsay
