Share for friends:

Dr. Tatiana's Sex Advice To All Creation (2003)

Dr. Tatiana's Sex Advice to All Creation (2003)

Book Info

Author
Rating
4.03 of 5 Votes: 5
Your rating
ISBN
0099283751 (ISBN13: 9780099283751)
Language
English
Publisher
vintage

About book Dr. Tatiana's Sex Advice To All Creation (2003)

From an evolutionary biology perspective, the battle of the sexes isn't just a metaphor: it's a war.Consider when male and female interests are not aligned: for many species, it's in a female's interest to mate with multiple males, in order to improve the genetic diversity of her offspring. Of course, it's in the male's interest for the female to mate only with him, so that he can fertilize all of the eggs and not have to worry about his offspring competing with their siblings. If the male has a trait that helps him in his goal, his genes will spread through the population; contrariwise, if a female evolves a countermeasure, her genes will likewise spread. It's an ongoing arms race, and a gruesome process: for example, the colony of feral sheep on Ile Longue in the Kerguelen Archipelago, which "makes Lord of the Flies look like a teddy bear convention". Rams will try to knock other rams off of ewes: from the male's perspective, if the female dies from the incessant battering, it's unfortunate, but not much different from the situation where another male besides him mates with her. We'll see how long the colony survives: maybe females will evolve to fight back. In fact, in many species the female kills and eats her mates, possibly as a response to just such a situation.Judson also addresses those most sexually deviant among all of creation: the true monogamists. (With the advent of DNA testing, it turns out there's even fewer of them than we thought.) A number of hypotheses have been proposed to account for this bizarre practice: there's the Danger Theory of Monogamy (in which leaving to find another mate entails a long or dangerous journey), the Pop-'Em-Out Theory of Monogamy (in which females are ready to breed again in less time than it would take to find another mate), the Sociopath Theory of Monogamy (in which individuals kill off any other members of their own sex, so there are no rivals to be had), and, of course, the Mutually Assured Destruction Theory of Monogamy (in which the female and her offspring absolutely require the male's presence to survive). Lest you think these are all pipe dreams, species exemplify each mode: the mantis shrimp Lysiosquilla sulcata, the Djungarian hamsters of Mongolia, the banded shrimp, and the hornbill, respectively.Judson closes with that timeless question, Are Men Necessary and concludes "usually, but not always". It's not uncommon for a species to revert from sexual to asexual reproduction, but such species usually go extinct shortly thereafter, with the glaring exception of the bdelloid rotifers, who, with more than 360 species without having reproduced sexually in the past 85 million years, seem to be doing just fine.Mammals, in fact, seem to be the only clade of animals without any known examples of asexual reproduction. For the most part, mammal sex isn't terribly interesting (only two sexes, no hermaphrodites, we don't gift one another with chemicals that protect us from predators, etc.), with the exception of the spotted hyena, which, I can only say, is truly remarkable for having survived as long as it has (more than 10% of females die the first time they give birth, and more than half of firstborn cubs are stillborn. Take that, intelligent design.)

Non-Fiction. Dr. Tatiana is the Dr. Ruth of the animal kingdom, that much is fictional, but the advice she gives is all fact, or, at the very least, theory.This is evolutionary biology framed like a relationship column. Dr. Tatiana takes letters from the birds, the bees, and the stick insects and advises them on their difficult love lives. It's a great way to get information across and the book is structured well, one topic easily leading to another. Judson never gets too technical and covers a lot of different sexual and reproductive practices, even dipping into the plant world from time to time. The book also has an index, author's notes, and an extensive bibliography, making it a good resource to find specific information, or to find further reading on the subject. The problem comes when Judson takes the conversational tone of an advice columnist and applies it to animals; it's almost as if she forgets that her readers are still human. She makes a lot of bad word choices. She repeatedly uses the word "slut" and its synonyms in ways that could be considered negative. She uses "cripple" and "imbecile" and there are entire chapters on forced sexual activity ("rape") and incest. At times, reading this was very much like being poked in the eye.I do love the way she repeatedly uses "sexy" to describe the myriad characteristics that animals find attractive; it's a good reminder that everyone has different things that turn them on, and overall her message seems to be one of acceptance for those of different genders, sexual practices, or lack of sexual practices, but the problematic language undermines that attitude.Three stars, would have gotten four if not for the consistently poor word choices; it took away a lot of my enjoyment of the book.

Do You like book Dr. Tatiana's Sex Advice To All Creation (2003)?

We read this for my book group. Olivia Judson is an evolutionary biologist who makes her living studying the mating behaviors of various species. She writes for both The Economist and the New York Times.For this book, she takes on the persona of Dr. Tatiana, a Dear Abbey-like sex therapist, who fields letters from all sorts of animals having troubles in the bedroom. Here's one example:Dear Dr. Tatiana,I'm a European praying mantis, and I've noticed I enjoy sex more if I bite my lovers' heads off first. . . .Do you find this too?I Like 'Em Headless in LondonShe then goes on to provide her advice to this insect, but really, she's just explaining the science and evolutionary possibilities for the very odd sexual behaviors we find in nature.I thought this was an interesting book. Probably would have been enough to just read a long article, but interesting none-the-less.
—Leslie

2.5 stars.Sigh. This is the kind of book that I really want to like. It is jam-packed full of information about reproduction, biology, life cycles, etc. throughout all kinds of life forms (with an emphasis on insects, it seems). What's more: the references are extensive; every "column" has its own section in back where she cites each claim's source. I was impressed with the documentation and with the wealth of knowledge.So why only 2.5 stars? There are a couple of reasons:1. The format concept. It's written like an advice column in Cosmo or something. But the "answers" ramble on and on and she'll make disparate points in one "answer," it doesn't seem to gel together for me. Also it's a lot of the same kind of stuff over and over, and while there was some truly fascinating things in here, I feel like I'm going to forget most of this information within a week. There was nothing to make the separate pieces of information stick in my head, with few exceptions (which had more to do with shocking reality of things--like in the spotted hyena's case--than with her writing). I've read other books and articles that deal with similar topics and the writers manage to make the information novel enough and different enough to stay in my memory.2. The tone of the book. Because it's written like a Cosmo column, the persistent "I'm super cool and sassy" delivery distracted me and got old pretty quickly. In this vein: she uses the word "slut," wonders if rape in the animal kingdom is really the result of females "asking for it," constantly uses the words "girls" and "boys" to describe mature animals engaging in reproductive sex... She anthropomorphizes a lot a lot a lot (which I don't have an issue with in itself, really, it just seems to make things more confusing in this case). She seems to think "radical feminists" hate men and want to destroy them. Which I found odd, since she's apparently a pretty smart scientist (degrees from Stanford, Oxford) and the vast majority of her acknowledgements go to males; you'd think she'd know better than anyone the challenges women face in the sciences. But maybe that's exactly the problem--maybe in order to make it that far she's had to ingratiate herself or something. Who knows? I don't. But I do know I didn't appreciate that aspect of it.
—Paige

This is an excellent book about the the sexual habits of life (not just humans, but all life), examined from an evolutionary perspective. The material is whimsically presented as a collection of sex advice columns from Dr. Tatiana: think Dr. Ruth giving advice to insects and fish, reptiles and mammals. An example of a “letter” from one of her readers, early in the book:“Dear Dr. Tatiana,My boyfriend is the handsomest golden potto I ever saw. He's got beautiful golden fur on his back, creamy white fur on his belly, he smells delicious, and he has ever such dainty hands and feet. There's just one thing. Please Dr. Tatiana, why is his penis covered with enormous spines?”Most of the book is focused on animal sexual behavior, but plants and even bacteria are both also touched on. In a remarkable way, the book deanthropomorphizes sex by first anthropomorphizing it, a tricky task to be sure. The writing is humorous, ribald, and highly intelligent. A wide range of topics and behaviors are covered, including such wide ranging mysteries as complex genitalia, promiscuity in both males and females, sperm competition, asexuality, cannibalism of mates, the strange and rare situation of monogamy, hermaphroditism, homosexuality, and incest. And while most of the book is focused on non-human sexual behavior, humans are not left out, with many of the chapters applying some of the factors to human sex and reproduction.Having heard the author (Olivia Judson, a science writer/journalist with a PhD in evolutionary biology from Stanford) speak about the book a few months ago, I must admit that I also "read" the book in her British accent, something which may have added an extra touch of atmosphere. There is definitely a British sense of humor underlying much of the book.Highly recommended!
—This Is Not The Michael You're Looking For

download or read online

Read Online

Write Review

(Review will shown on site after approval)

Other books in category Young Adult Fantasy & Science Fiction