If I was going to look at this from the perspective of a scientist, I would probably reject this book as horribly biased and fraught with methodological issues. Like, does she ever look at alternative hypotheses? Does she ever not write about science as a cute dialogue? But in sum, she does take ...
One of the nice things about writing reviews on a place like Goodreads is the audience. I can pontificate about a book, and about subjects like feminism, for as long as I like, which is something I can’t do with my friends in person—at least, as I discovered empirically, not if I want to have fri...